Step tracking on the Moto 360 involves sophisticated algorithms that consider various factors influencing accuracy. While wrist-based pedometers like the Moto 360 provide valuable insights into physical activity, it's essential to be aware of the algorithms' limitations and considerations.
Algorithm Dynamics:
1. Arm-Swinging Impact:
- Wrist-based pedometers may be influenced by arm-swinging or the lack thereof. Activities like pushing a stroller may pose challenges for accurate step tracking due to limited wrist movement.
2. Waist-Based Trackers Comparison:
- Unlike waist-based trackers, such as phones or traditional pedometers, wrist-based trackers focus on wrist movement. While effective in many scenarios, certain activities, like driving, may pose challenges for accurate step calculation.
3. Algorithm Guidelines:
- Wrist-based pedometers employ algorithms as guidelines for measuring health and physical activity. It's crucial to understand that these measurements may not always be pinpoint accurate but provide valuable insights.
Testing for Accuracy:
1. Comparison with Foot-Based Trackers:
- During the development of the Moto 360, extensive testing is conducted alongside foot-based trackers to ensure accuracy across various scenarios.
2. Goal: Within 10% Accuracy:
- The aim is to achieve step count accuracy within 10% of the actual count in all cases. Special attention is given to enhancing accuracy during common tasks like outdoor walking.
3. Continuous Improvement:
- The Moto 360 team is committed to refining algorithms to provide users with the most accurate step tracking possible, recognizing the importance of reliable health and activity data.
While step tracking algorithms offer valuable insights, users should view the results as approximations rather than precise measurements. The Moto 360 team remains dedicated to continuous improvement, striving to deliver accurate step counts and reliable health data for users in diverse scenarios.